If I Understood You, Would I Have This Look on My Face? My Adventures in the Art and Science of Relating and Communicating
Author: Alan Alda
ISBN-10: 1524781924
ISBN-13: 978-1524781927
 
APA Style Citation
Alda, A. (2017). If I understood you, would I have this look on my face? My adventures in the art and science of relating and communicating. New York, NY: Random House LLC.
 
Buy This Book
https://www.amazon.com/Understood-Would-Have-This-Look/dp/1524781924
​

​Book Description
What is the key to communication? Alan Alda, author of the book If I Understood You, Would I Have This Look on My Face? My Adventures in the Art and Science of Relating and Communicating, believes it is empathy and recognizing what the other person is thinking. He is an actor, writer, and director. Some may know him from his role on the TV show M*A*S*H and various movie appearances. Others know him within the scientific community as host of the PBS show Scientific American Frontiers and founder of the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University.  Recently, he has also been thrust into the spotlight by sharing his diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. His varied history within the fields of science and media provides him an interesting perspective when answering the question of how to enhance communication. He started with wanting to teach scientists how to communicate better, but now wants to share what he learned with you so you can become a better communicator.
 
As he ventured into the world of interviewing scientists, he recognized the need to listen with his eyes, ears, and feelings. He believes his training in improvisation helped him do just that and can help you too. Through games and exercises, your communication can be transformed. These theater games include sharing something in space, using mirroring exercises, guessing the relationship, and playing imaginary games, such as volleyball or tug-of-war. He also explored the fundamental rule of improv known as “Yes, and…” in the context of communication. If one can start with where the listener is in their knowledge and build, they will have more successful communication.  According to Alda, the person delivering the message is responsible for good communication, not the person receiving it. You need to listen to what the audience needs and is feeling. This advice works in all areas of life, including business and personal relationships. 
 
Not all empathy is created equal. Empathy is never good if it traps you in quicksand and encompasses your life. It can also be bad if it is being used to keep others submissive, what Alda refers to as dark empathy. This topic is further addressed in a blog entry for Against Empathy under the category Motivation/Emotion. Alda uses examples of bullies, torture sessions, and dishonorable sales techniques to point out how empathy can be used in a negative way. But then he quickly emphasizes that empathy is not the basis of good behavior, but rather a tool for communication.  A little acting training that involves empathy, can lead to a positive doctor-patient relationship and improve communication in those on the autism spectrum. It can also enhance writing and teaching.
 
On Scientific American Frontiers, Alda was always willing to volunteer and throw himself into the research. So when he was curious about the power of empathy on communication, he began a personal journey. He started to practice reading the faces of strangers, listening to people, and mentally attaching a word to what he thought was the emotion they were experiencing. He believed that naming emotions would help increase empathy. He was able to test this hypothesis with the help of a colleague and a cellphone application that allowed one to record every time you read someone’s emotion and labeled it. After one week with daily practice of paying attention to emotions and faces, his empathy did improve.
 
Along the journey to enhance communication, Alda explores what both helps and hurts communication. He shares how emotions make experiences memorable. In particular, laughter not only aids in memory but helps people connect. Stories provide the perfect vehicle to build a personal connection. A little dramatic action in the story is sure to catch the listener. People also become better communicators when they recognize what they have in common with each other. On the flip side, there are some aspects to avoid. Jargon and the curse of knowledge prevent people from communicating.  One of the most challenging roadblocks to communication is when you can’t imagine what it is like to not have that knowledge. It prevents you from being able to truly listen to the other person.  
 
Daily life offers you a continuous chance at improvisation. While there are no specific tips necessary to increase empathy, Alda encourages you to make personal connections and experience improvisation if you can. To get better at communication, it takes practice and being able to read another person. It is an art, not a formula. So keep practicing!
 
Other Related Resources
Author Website
http://alanalda.com/
 
Clear + Vivid Podcast
http://www.aldacommunicationtraining.com/podcasts/
 
Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science
https://www.aldacenter.org/
 
Alan Alda Twitter
https://twitter.com/search?q=alan+alda&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch
 
Life’s Work: Interview with Alan Alda
https://hbr.org/2017/07/alan-alda
 
NPR: Learning Life’s Lessons from Alan Alda
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4856461
 
Alan Alda has Parkinson’s disease
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/31/entertainment/alan-alda-parkinsons/index.html
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/31/634346984/i-m-not-angry-alan-alda-says-he-s-living-with-parkinson-s
 
Mirror Neurons
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-social-brain/
 
TED Talk- Helen Riess and Doctor-Patient Empathy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baHrcC8B4WM
 
Psychological Figures and Concepts
Albert Bandura
Carl Rogers
Daniel Goleman
Edward Thorndike
Michael Gazzaniga
Sigmund Freud
 
Active listening
Affective resonance
Altruism
Amygdala
Attention
Autism spectrum
Body language
Cognitive empathy
Communication
Corpus callosum
Dreams
EEG
Emotional intelligence
Empathy
Epilepsy
Facial expressions
Fear
fMRI
Humor
Learned helplessness
Lie detectors
Meditation
Memory
Meta-analysis
Mirror neurons
MRI
Neuroscientists
Oxytocin
Self-regulation
Similarity
Social awareness
Split brain
Stress-hormone response
Theory of mind

​Patient H.M.:  A Story of Memory, Madness, and Family Secrets
Author:  Luke Dittrich
ISBN:  978-0-8129-8252-7
 
APA Style Citation
Dittrich, L. (2017).  Patient H.M.:  A Story of Memory, Madness, and Family Secrets
Penguin, Random House, New York, N.Y.
 
Buy the Book
https://www.amazon.com/Patient-H-M-Memory-Madness-Secrets/dp/0812982525

Book Description
Luke Dittrich spent sixyears conducting impeccable research on perhaps the most famous patient in the history of neuroscience, Henry Gustav Molaison.  During his life,he was knownasH.M.;,Henryis often citedas the original case study to help neuroscientists understand the role of the hippocampus in encoding short-term to long-term memories.  Henry had dealt with increasingly alarmingand dangerous seizures since he was hit by a bicycle at age eight.  Nearly 20 years later, Dr. William Beecher Scoville, a dashing, daring surgeon burrowed deep into Henry`s temporal lobe and into the hippocampus in an effort toease the occurrence of the seizures. Dittrich had a motivating force driving his long-term research on this project, Dr. Scoville was his grandfather.
 
While Henry Molaison is the central figure of the book, the story is set against a backdrop of the debate about the proper way toconduct a lobotomy, treatment of the mentally ill in the 1950s and the very real possibility that Dr. Scoville carried out a lobotomy on his own wife who suffered a psychotic break and was sent to the Instituteof the Living in Hartford,Connecticut.  Dittrich describes heating and cooling treatments, which were an essential component of treating psychosis prior tothe availability of antipsychotic medication.
Dittrich remembers his grandmother as quiet and reserved but never knew about her history with mental illness prior tohis research for the book.  Dittrich describes some of his grandfather`s risky surgical practices such as scheduling lobotomies on Saturdays or after hours even after most of the medical community had rejected their use.  He compares his grandfather to the even more reckless Walter Freeman who wanted to allow psychologists rather than only neurosurgeonsto conduct lobotomies.  Freeman used the barbaric “ice pick” lobotomy while Scoville used specially designed instruments to limit the depth and breadth of the damage to the cerebrum.  Freeman operated on patients as young as 7 and as old as 72.  Both men conducted thevast majority of lobotomies on women, most of whom were psychotic, but some with depressive disorders or even others who were simply considered to be “rebellious.”
 
For 20 years Henry lived with his seizures,andwhile this eventually prevented him from working, he was able to attend high school and had many recollections of his childhood. He recalled a girl in junior high whomhe had a crush on (she did not remember him), he recalled details about his parents and the homes in which they lived when he was a child,but had virtually no personal memories after his surgery.  Because of the notoriety of H.M. (as he was knownin the research during his life), many individuals wanted to work with Henry to make their mark on the history of neuroscience.  While Scoville conducted the surgery, he did not play a large role in Henry`s treatment or care post-surgery.  Brenda Milner, a young female psychologist in a time when there were very few in the field, completed the psychological testing on Henry.  While she tested him for many years, he never recognized her from one visit to the next.  Henry met her for a series of tests both at McGill University where she worked and in his hometown.  Henry`s episodic and semantic memories were essentially destroyed,butMilner found that he improved on the procedural task of outlining a star in the mirror.  Henry claimed to have never seen the task before,,but improved on the task each time it was presented.  He acknowledged that he found it quite easy, he could not identify whyhis performance was so quick.  Milner concluded that procedural memories are heldin a location of the brain (cerebellum) distinct from those areas that held episodic and semantic memories.  Thismay help to explain why other amnesiac patients like Clive Wearing have retained the procedural skills such as playing the organ they held before the hippocampal damage such as playing the organ.  
 
When Henry`s parents passed away, adistant cousin became Henry`s guardian but gave the authority of all medicaland research decisions to Susan Corkinof MIT.  Susan Corkin by coincidence was a friend of Scoville`s daughter (Dittrich`s mother) who was a neurologist and oversaw who had contact with Henry.  She strictly regulated who came into contact with Henry and rejected most requests to work with himwithout giving them serious consideration.  Some believe she was fiercely protective in order tosave H.M.`s anonymity, others like Dittrich believe that she did this out of self-interest in order tohave sole access to the most famous patient in neurological history. Even with his family connection, Corkin refused to let Dittrich meet H.M. or even share his location.  She eventually sent a detailed list of restrictions written up by MIT lawyers regarding what Dittrich could and could not do, which he rejected, but eventually,he found out who H.M. was on his own.  
 
After Henry`s death, the world was allowed to know his real name and Corkin realized she needed help if she were to continue to study Henry`s brain after his death.  She employed the help of Jacopo Annese of the Brain Observatory in San Diego, California.  He carried Henry`s brain from Boston back to his lab where it was encased in silicone and live-streamedin 2010 as it was cutinto 2,401 slices.  These slices could be studied in detail to better understand the extent of the damage to Henry`s brain.  Annese found that the hippocampus had not been entirely destroyedas previously believed.  After over a year with the brain, Annese wanted to continue the investigation with Henry`s brain and intended to publish papers based on his findings.  He was sued by MITfor the return of the brain which Corkin wanted to reside permanently at the Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital.  After a prolonged fight, the brain was returnedto Massachusetts.  
 
The contributions of Henry Molaison to science are significant in part because of the trauma he suffered as a child.  However so are the nameless others who underwent leucotomies, lobotomies, insulin shock treatment, extreme heat or cold or other experimental procedures in which the results and impacts were unknown.  
 
Other Related Resources
Interview with Author Luke Dittrich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7akPs8ptg4
 
H.M. Brain Slicing with Dr. Ramachandran and Roger Bingham
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKzOQ1uezYc
 
PBS: Interview with Susan Corkin about H.M.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/corkin-hm-memory.html
 
Luke Dittrich interview with Susan Corkin
https://medium.com/@lukedittrich/questions-answers-about-patient-h-m-ae4ddd33ed9c
 
Famous Amnesia Patient`s Brain Cut into 2,401 pieces
https://www.livescience.com/42898-patient-hm-postmortem-brain.html
 
BRAIN:  A Journal of Neurology
Brenda Milner Biographyon her 100thbirthday:  a lifetime of “good ideas”[JF1] 
https://www.psych.ualberta.ca/GCPWS/Milner/Biography/Milner_bio1.html
 
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation :  Brenda Milner turns 100
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/trailblazing-montreal-neuroscientist-brenda-milner-turns-100-1.4743054
 
Brenda Milner: Neuroscientist (video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JliczINA__Y&t=426s
 
The Society of Neurological Surgeons:  Profile of William Beecher Scoville
https://www.societyns.org/society/bio.aspx?MemberID=7664
 
Wired:  The Untold Story about Neuroscience`s Most Famous Brain
https://www.wired.com/2016/08/untold-story-neurosciences-famous-brain/
https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-abstract/141/8/2527/5050904?redirectedFrom=fulltext
 
https://bigpictureeducation.com/brain-case-study-patient-hm
 
https://www.npr.org/2016/08/14/489997276/how-patient-h-m-and-his-lobotomy-contributed-to-understanding-memories
 
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/corkin-hm-memory.html
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/07/magazine/the-brain-that-couldnt-remember.html
 ​
Psychological Figures and Concepts
Jacopo Annese
Gotlieb Burckhardt
Susan Corkin
Walter Freeman
Sigmund Freud
Phineas Gage
Karl Lashley
Anton Mesmer
Brenda Milner
Egaz Moniz
Wilder Penfield
Hermann Rorschach
William Scoville
James Watts
David Wechsler
 
Antipsychotic medication
Amygdala
Anterograde Amnesia
Arachnoid Mater
Auditory Cortex
Broca`s Area
Cerebrum
Cerebellum
Cerebral Cortex
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Corpus Callosum
Electroencephaologram(EEG)
Endocrinology
Epilepsy
Free Association
Frontal Lobes
Homunculus
Hypothalamus
Informed Consent
Insulin Shock Treatment
Leucotomy
Limbic System
Lobotomy
Localization of Function
Meninges
Motor Cortex
MRI
Neuroanatomist
Neurologist
Olfactory Cortex
Phrenology
Psychoanalysis
Psychosurgery
Repressed Memories
Retrograde Amnesia
Short-term Memory
Temporal Lobe
Thorazine
Unconsciousness